neutralizing anti-ccl2 monoclonal antibody (Thermo Fisher)
Structured Review

Neutralizing Anti Ccl2 Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/neutralizing+anti-ccl2+antibody/ccl2+cytokine/pmc11621011-103-34-39
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "ICAM1 + gingival fibroblasts modulate periodontal inflammation to mitigate bone loss"
Article Title: ICAM1 + gingival fibroblasts modulate periodontal inflammation to mitigate bone loss
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1484483
Figure Legend Snippet: Inflammatory ICAM1 + fibroblasts expand in a murine model of ligature-induced periodontitis. (A) Flow cytometry gating strategy for analysis of lineage-negative (CD45 - CD31 - EpCam - Ter119 - ) pericytes, gingival fibroblasts and ICAM1 + fibroblasts in non-ligated control (NL) and ligature induced periodontitis (LIP) group. (B) Quantification of percent fibroblasts (Lin - PDGFRA + ) and pericytes (Lin - CD146 + ) normalized by Lin - mesenchymal cell numbers in NL and LIP groups. Each dot represents one mouse as a split-mouth design. (C) Quantification of percent ICAM1 + fibroblasts (Lin - PDGFRA + ICAM1 + ) normalized by total fibroblast numbers. Each dot represents one mouse as a split-mouth design. (D) Representative immunofluorescent images of NL and LIP paraffin sections stained with antibodies specific against ICAM1 (red) and PDGFRA (green). Arrows point to ICAM1 + PDGFRA + cells. Scale bar, 100μm; inset scale bar, 10μm. (E) Quantification of ICAM1 fibroblast numbers normalized by lamina propria area (mm 2 ) comparing NL and LIP groups from the immunofluorescence experiments. (F) Left, representative immunocytochemistry images of primary gingival fibroblasts stained with ICAM1 antibody comparing control versus stimulated groups. Lipopolysaccharide from P. gingivalis (LPS, 1 ug/ml) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF, 10 ng/ml) were used for stimulation. Scale bar, 20 μm. Right, quantification of ICAM1 + fibroblast numbers normalized by total fibroblast cells comparing control and LPS+TNF group. (G) Schematic diagram of qPCR for fibroblast-derived cytokines comparing FACS-sorted ICAM1 - and ICAM1 + fibroblasts in human and mouse models of periodontitis. (H, I) Quantification of relative mRNA expression by qPCR for CXCL13, CXCL1, CXCL2, CCL19, and CCL2 comparing sorted ICAM1 - and ICAM1 + fibroblasts. (H) Gingival tissue specimens from N=8 periodontitis patients; each dot represents individual patient. (G) Gingival tissues harvested from mice with LIP; each dot represents pooled samples from 2-3 mice for a total of 4 data points (N=10 mice). Data represent mean ± SEM. Welch’s t-test (B–H) and Mann-Whitney U test (I) comparing control vs. experimental group; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ns, not significant.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Control, Staining, Immunofluorescence, Immunocytochemistry, Derivative Assay, Expressing, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Left, representative flow cytometry histogram of CCL2 signal in 7d ligated control and experimental mice. Middle and right, quantification of percent CCL2 + ICAM1 + fibroblasts (Lin - PDGFRA + ) and CCL2 + pericytes (Lin - CD146 + ) normalized by lineage-negative mesenchymal cell numbers. (B) Representative flow cytometry histogram of ICAM1 expression in fibroblasts pre-gated for CCL2 + signal in control or ICAM1 + oral fibroblast-enriched conditions (LPS + TNF) treated with or without BMS-345541 in vitro. (C) Left, quantification of ICAM1 + CCL2 + fibroblasts cell counts by flow cytometry analysis. Right, ELISA analysis of CCL2 concentration in the supernatant of cultured control or ICAM1 + enriched fibroblast conditions with or without BMS-345541. (D) Top, representative gating strategy for CCL2 + cell phenotyping by flow cytometry using tissues collected from CCL2 mCherry reporter mice that had ligature placed for 7 days. Bottom right, quantification of CCL2 + fibroblasts (CD45 - EpCAM - PDGFRA + ), leukocytes (CD45 + ), endothelial cells (CD31 + ), epithelial cells (EpCAM + ), and pericytes (CD31 - CD146 + ) normalized by total CCL2 + cells. Each dot represents one mouse (N=4). (E) Top, representative immunofluorescent images of non-ligated control (NL) and ligature induced periodontitis (LIP) from CCL2 mCherry reporter mice. Paraffin sections were stained with antibodies specific against PDGFRA (green) and red fluorescent protein (red), and immunopositivity in the lamina propria and periodontal ligament space (PDL) was examined. Scale bar, 20μm.Bottom, quantification of percent CCL2 + fibroblasts (CCL2 + PDFGRA + ) normalized by total nucleated cells in field of view. N=3, split mouth design. (F) Schematic diagram of in vitro phagocytosis assay using conditioned media from ICAM1 + enriched oral fibroblast culture and primary bone marrow-derived macrophages. (G) Top, flow cytometry gating strategy for identification of double positive F4/80 + fluorescence beads + from in vitro phagocytosis assay. Bottom, representative flow cytometry histogram of fluorescence beads signals showing three distinct peaks from control, conditioned media (CM), and CM + anti-CCL2 neutralization groups. (H) Quantification of fluorescence beads + F4/80 + macrophage numbers per 10 4 events. Left, number of beads + F4/80 + with a first peak (one bead) in the histogram; right, number of beads + F4/80 + with a second or third peak (two or three beads phagocytosed). N=3 each. All in vitro experiments were repeated independently twice. Data represents mean ± SEM. For (A) , one-way ANOVA test followed by pairwise t-test’s with Šidák’s correction was performed. For (C) Brown Forsythe ANOVA test with Dunnett’s T3 Multiple comparison test; ns, not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Control, Expressing, In Vitro, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Concentration Assay, Cell Culture, Staining, Phagocytosis Assay, Derivative Assay, Fluorescence, Neutralization, Comparison
Related Articles
other:Article Title: PRPS2‐mediated modulation of the antitumor immune response in lung cancer through CCL2 ‐mediated tumor‐associated macrophages and myeloid‐derived suppressor cells Article Snippet: Supernatants from various LLC, LLC‐PRPS2, LLC‐shPRPS2 cells were added to the lower chambers with or without neutralizing Article Title: PRPS2-mediated modulation of the antitumor immune response in lung cancer through CCL2-mediated tumor-associated macrophages and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Article Snippet: Supernatants from various LLC, LLCPRPS2, LLC-shPRPS2 cells were added to the lower chambers with or without neutralizing |


